You provide the
information; we'll check your compliance and give you the results Instantly!
ADA Structure
The ADA consists of five titles that outline required access and
accommodations:
- Title I pertains to employers with 15 or more workers,
labor organizations and employment agencies. It is enforced by the Equal
Employment Opportunity Commission.
- Title II applies to public entities, such as state and
local government, as well as public transportation systems. It is employed
by the Department of Justice, Department of Transportation or other federal
agencies, depending on the nature of the entity.
- Title III applies to private sector places where people
meet or where business is conducted, known as public accommodations. It is
enforced by the Department of Justice.
- Title IV applies to providers of telecommunications and
information technology services. It is enforced by the Federal
Communications Commission.
- Title V contains supplemental provisions that clarify
that both states and Congress are covered by all provisions of the ADA. It
also provides for recovery of legal fees, establishes a mechanism for
technical assistance and instructs federal agencies required to implement
the act. Additionally, Title V includes a provision prohibiting either (a)
coercing or threatening or (b) retaliating against the disabled or those
attempting to aid people with disabilities in asserting their rights under
the ADA.
Historical Context of the ADA
The following information is excerpted from the Core Curriculum developed by
Adaptive Environments, Inc. for NIDRR.
Please note: The ADA has been amended several times since
its passage in 1990 and is undergoing continuous interpretation in the court
systems. Contact your DBTAC: ADA Center at (800) 949-4232 (V/TTY) for the most
up-to-date information.
Origins of Disability Rights Law
The legal and political roots of the ADA are deep in the civil rights era of
the 1960s. In terms of formal legal precedent, the ADA has been described as,
"... an amalgam of two great civil rights statutes, the Civil Rights Act of 1964
and Title V of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 ... The ADA generally uses the
framework of titles II and VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 for coverage and
enforcement ... and the terms and concepts of Section 504 ... for what
constitutes discrimination."
The passage of Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1974 established the
critical bridge between disability and antidiscrimination policy and law.
Section 504 prohibits discrimination on the basis of a disability towards
otherwise qualified people with disabilities by recipients of federal financial
assistance. The statutory language of Section 504 is based on Title VI of the
Civil Rights Act of 1964, but is much narrower in its coverage. Unlike the Civil
Rights Act of 1964, Section 504 does not mandate compliance with
nondiscrimination requirements by employers or public accommodations in the
private sector. It also does not reach publicly funded programs that do not
receive federal financial assistance.
The Rehabilitation Act of 1973 was the product of controversy and compromise
between Congress and the Nixon administration. Nixon had vetoed an earlier
version of the Rehabilitation Act in 1972 because it included provisions
expanding the traditional vocational focus of the federal/state rehabilitation
system into the area of non-vocational, independent living services.
However, Section 504 and the other provisions of Title V were not part of the
dispute between Congress and the administration. To the congressional leadership
of the time, many of whom had been supporters of the civil rights legislation of
the previous decade, the extension of the guarantees of equal opportunity and
equal protection to people with disabilities seemed a necessary step in keeping
with the fundamental values of our democratic, constitutional traditions. In
practice, however, addressing the particular forms of discrimination experienced
by people with disabilities posed new and distinctive challenges. It was four
years before regulations implementing Section 504 were finally issued by the
Carter administration. The publication of the regulations occurred only after an
aggressive national campaign by disability rights advocates to prevent weakening
of the regulations and further delay in their implementation. The highlight of
the campaign was a nearly four-week occupation of the U.S. Department of Health,
Education and Welfare offices in San Francisco by people with disabilities.
Reference: Wodatch J. (1990). The ADA: What it says. Worklife, 3,
3.
Back to top
Civil Rights Era (1960s)
The legislative phase of the Civil Rights Era saw the enactment of three
major civil rights statutes between 1964 and 1968.
In 1963, decades of organizing and struggle by African-Americans culminated
in the historic March on Washington. At the march, Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.
stood before the Lincoln Memorial and defined the Civil Rights Movement's vision
of a just and inclusive society to the refrain "I Have a Dream."
Late in 1963, following the assassination of John F. Kennedy in Dallas,
Lyndon Johnson assumed the presidency. Capitalizing on the momentum generated by
the march and other effective strategies and applying his own unparalleled
understanding of the workings of Capitol Hill, Johnson pressed the civil rights
agenda forward. The enactment of the first of the major civil rights statutes,
the Civil Rights Act of 1964, was a watershed moment in American history. Among
its other ramifications, it established the statutory foundation on which
Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, and later the ADA, was
constructed.
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 was broad in its scope, encompassing recipients
of federal funds, employers and places of public accommodation, such as bus
stations, restrooms and lunch counters, which had figured so prominently in
"sit-ins" and "freedom rides." The act was also broad in its definition of
protected classes. It prohibited discrimination on the basis of race, religion
and national origin. However, the act did not cover people with disabilities.
Disability would not be linked to the mainstream of civil rights law which
flowed from the Civil Rights Act until Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of
1973 was enacted almost a decade later.
In 1965, the second major antidiscrimination statute of the civil rights era,
the Voting Rights Act, was enacted, followed by the Fair Housing Act three years
later.
Following King's assassination in Memphis in 1968, the last of the major
civil rights statutes of the 1960s was passed. The Civil Rights Act of 1968
moved through Congress with extraordinary speed, spurred by an outpouring of
anger by African-Americans and other concerned people across the United States.
Title VIII of the act prohibited discrimination on the basis of race, religion,
national origin and sex in the sale and rental of housing, but the Fair Housing
Act, like the Civil Rights Act of 1964, did not include people with disabilities
among its protected classes. In 1988, however, the Fair Housing Act was amended
to add two new protected classes: people with disabilities and families with
children.
In the same year as the Fair Housing Act, a significant piece of disability
legislation was enacted; one which demonstrated, however, that the redefinition
of disability policy in terms of civil rights was not yet underway. The
Architectural Barriers Act of 1968 required that buildings constructed or
altered by or on behalf of the United States, leased by the federal government
or financed by federal grants or loans – if the authorizing statute permits
design standards – be designed and constructed to be accessible to persons with
disabilities. The ABA, while not initially effective, established the foundation
for later efforts to provide accessibility in federally funded facilities.
The ABA was not civil rights legislation. It had no teeth and was poorly
enforced until later action by the Congress linked access policy to civil rights
and created an enforcement and technical assistance agency. The Architectural
and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board, known as the federal Access Board,
was established in 1973 under Section 502 of the Rehabilitation Act, part of the
same Title V as Section 504. The Access Board is composed of the heads of 12
federal agencies, or their high-ranking designees, and 13 public members
appointed by the President, at least a majority of whom must be persons with
disabilities. As recognition of the necessity of physical and communication
accessibility for people with disabilities grew within the federal government,
the Access Board was strengthened through a series of congressional actions.
Eventually it assumed its current status as a key federal agency, establishing
design and scoping standards for facilities covered by the Architectural
Barriers Act, Section 504 and the ADA.
In political terms, the influence of the civil rights era lies in the fact
that many individuals with disabilities who later became active in the
Disability Rights Movement were inspired by the struggle of African-Americans
and the Women’s Movement for civil rights. Both movements demonstrated the
possibilities for creative political and personal responses to discrimination
and social devaluation and emphasized the need for personal empowerment and
community organization among people with disabilities who had traditionally been
isolated, not only from the mainstream of society, but from one another.
Back to top
Developing Disability Rights Laws
From the 1970s to the present, activism among people with disabilities has
become increasingly visible, both nationally and internationally. The emergence
of the Disability Rights and Independent Living Movements has been critical to
the development of state and federal disability policy leading up to and
including the ADA.
During the past several decades, disability activism in the United States has
been directed at basic civil rights issues such as:
- Pressuring HEW to issue the regulations implementing Section 504 in
1977.
- Carrying out a national campaign to train people with disabilities,
parents of children with disabilities and other advocates and supporters in
the use of Section 504 in the late 1970s.
- Organizing the defense of Section 504 and IDEA from threatened
deregulation by the Reagan administration in the early 1980s.
- Strengthening disability rights law at the state and local level
throughout the whole period.
- Advocating education for children with disabilities and fulfillment of
the mandate of IDEA to provide an education in "the least restrictive
environment,"
- Organizing support for the enactment and implementation of the ADA.
Disability activism has also been directed at "independent living" issues
related to the development of services and resources needed to support the
personal independence of people with disabilities and to expand options for
living in the community and participating fully in community life, such as:
- Developing the national network of Centers for Independent Living that
combine self-help services and advocacy in organizations that are typically
controlled and led by people with disabilities.
- Closing down custodial institutions for people with cognitive and
psychiatric disabilities and developing housing and services to support
community integration.
- Expanding adaptive equipment and home-modification services.
In the early 1980s, the Reagan administration, as part of its general
deregulatory effort, attempted to weaken Section 504 and IDEA. The
administration's effort was spearheaded by the Commission of Regulatory Relief,
chaired by Vice President George Bush. A broad coalition, including people with
disabilities, parents, legal and professional advocates and service providers,
organized quickly and was successful in protecting both Section 504 and IDEA. As
president, Bush vigorously supported the passage of the ADA.
Following the successful defense of Section 504 and IDEA, the focus on
disability rights shifted to the state and local levels. Many states enacted or
strengthened state nondiscrimination statutes, accessibility codes and other
progressive disability policies. Independent Living Centers continued to spread.
State and municipal offices and commissions on disability appeared in many
communities. Protection and advocacy agencies broadened their scope to represent
and involve people with a wider range of disabilities. The Parents Movement
continued to fight for inclusive education and community services.
Back to top
Disability Rights Laws (1970s)
Four years after the enactment of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, the first
set of regulations implementing Section 504 were issued by the HEW.
In 1975, Public Law 94-142, the Education for all Handicapped Children Act,
was passed. Since renamed the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act was
the first federal law to mandate that all children with disabilities receive a
free, appropriate public education and specified that education occur in the
least restrictive environment. Coming two years after the
passage of the Rehabilitation Act and Section 504, the act made it clear that a
major revision of national disability policy was taking place; a revision driven
by the integration imperative and grounded in a fundamental revaluation of the
role of people with disabilities in American society.
Public schools currently have obligations to students with disabilities under
both IDEA and ADA. As local government entities, public schools have obligations
under ADA which extend not only to students with disabilities who qualify for
services under IDEA, but also to other students with disabilities, employees,
parents and members of the public who have disabilities.
The movement towards the inclusion of children with disabilities remains
controversial today. Many more children with disabilities now receive publicly
funded education, but what constitutes the least restrictive environment is
often a matter of conflict among education officials, parents, advocates and
children with disabilities.
Back to top
Disability Rights Laws (1980s)
Disability rights continued to evolve and experienced a watershed year in
1988 with a number of critical developments. Legislation introduced throughout
the 1980s included:
Air Carrier Access Act
In 1986, Congress passed the Air Carriers Act, addressing the rights of people
with disabilities to the use air transportation. Any individual or private
entity that directly or indirectly, by lease or other arrangement, engages in
air transportation is obligated under the ACAA to:
- Operate in a nondiscriminatory manner.
- Provide accessible and usable facilities.
- Provide access features in certain new and renovated aircraft.
- To provide limited communications access for people with hearing
impairments including:
- Access to phone reservation and information services.
- At least one Telecommunication Device for the Deaf in each terminal.
- Open captioning or equivalent alternative means of communication
when safety briefings are presented to passengers on video screens.
Reference: 14 CFR 382.23 382.7, 382.23, 382.39, 382.43, 382.45, 382.47
The Civil Rights
Restoration Act of 1988
By enacting the Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1988, Congress took the
initiative to broaden the application of civil rights laws, including Section
504 and the Civil Rights Act of 1964, to recipients of federal funds.
In the Grove City case, the Supreme Court narrowed the obligation of federal
recipients to comply with antidiscrimination mandates to only those specific
programs with larger organizations that directly received federal funding. The
Civil Rights Restoration Act mandated that organizations as a whole comply with
antidiscrimination requirements.
Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988
The Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988 was signed into law by President Reagan
in September 1988 and became effective on March 12, 1989. FHAA extends the civil
rights protections of the Fair Housing Act, Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act
of 1968, to two new protected classes – people with disabilities and families
with children. The act prohibits discrimination towards people with disabilities
in the sale or rental of housing and in the terms, conditions, services or
facilities provided.
The definition of disability under the FHAA is the same as the definition
under the ADA, which does not cover private housing. FHAA has specific
requirements related to disability in three areas:
- Reasonable accommodations in operating policies and procedures.
- Modifications to dwelling units and premises.
- Design standards for new construction.
The landlord or rental agent may not refuse to make reasonable accommodations
in rules, policies, practices and services to afford a person with a disability
equal opportunity to occupy and enjoy full use of a unit. It is unlawful under
the FHAA for a landlord to refuse to permit a tenant to make reasonable
modifications necessary to enjoy full use of the premises. However,
modifications must be made at the expense of the tenant.
The landlord has the right to require that the tenant:
- Demonstrate that any modifications will be carried out competently and
professionally.
- Make reasonable restoration of the interior of the premises to its
original condition.
- In some cases, establish an escrow account to cover the cost of the
restoration.
FHAA Accessible Design Standards
- At least one building entrance must be on an accessible route.
- Construct accessible and usable public and common-use areas.
- All doors on the premises must be wide enough to accommodate
wheelchairs.
- All ground-floor units and all units on elevator floors must have:
- An accessible route into and through the dwelling.
- Accessible switches, outlets and other controls.
- Reinforced bathroom walls at toilet, tub and shower.
- Wheelchair maneuverable kitchens and bathrooms.
Public Housing Regulations
The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Affairs, 11 years after HEW’s issuance
of the first Section 504 policies, issued regulations covering federally funded
public housing and other recipients of HUD funds, such as the Community
Development Block Grant Programs.
Back to top
Enactment of the ADA
In 1986, the National Council on Disability issued a statement, "Toward
Independence," recommending that a comprehensive law requiring equal opportunity
for individuals with disabilities be enacted. The council drafted the first
version of the ADA which was introduced in 1988 during the 100th Congress. The
Task Force on Rights and Empowerment of Americans with Disabilities, under the
energetic chairmanship of Justin Dart, Jr., built support nationally, holding
hearings in every state.
A second version of the act was introduced in May 1989, with further
amendments passed by the Senate on September 7, 1989. Five separate committees
held hearings before the House passed its version of the bill on May 22, 1990.
Following two conferences between the House and Senate to resolve their
differences on the bill, the ADA in its final form passed both Houses in
mid-July with overwhelming majorities and key sponsors and supporters from both
parties.
The ADA is extremely complex and the deliberations within Congress and
between Congress and the administration were detailed and not without
controversy. The Disability Rights Education and Defense Fund led a very
effective negotiating team on behalf of the disability community.
On the morning of July 26, 1990, on the south lawn of the White House, with
3,000 disability rights advocates, as well as members of Congress and the
administration, looking on, President Bush signed the ADA into law. It was the
largest such signing ceremony in history. Bush described the ADA as:
"the world's first comprehensive declaration of the equality of people with
disabilities, and evidence of America's leadership internationally in the cause
of human rights. With today's signing of the landmark Americans with
Disabilities Act, every man woman and child with a disability can now pass
through once closed doors, into a bright new era of equality, independence and
freedom."
The President traced the ADA's roots in American history back through the
Civil Rights Act of 1964 to the Declaration of Independence, stating that:
"We are keeping faith with the spirit of our ... forefathers who wrote ...
'We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that
they are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights.' This Act is
powerful in its simplicity. It will ensure that people with disabilities are
given the basic guarantees ... (of) freedom of choice, control of their lives,
the opportunity to blend fully and equally into the ... mosaic of the American
mainstream."
During the Clinton administration, the president and the attorney general
reaffirmed the commitment of the executive branch to energetic implementation of
the ADA.
In its deliberations on the ADA, Congress cited a figure of 43 million
Americans having one or more physical or mental disabilities, with more recent
census figures estimating 53 million. The number of people who have disabilities
is large and continues to grow significantly as individuals reach their sixth
and seventh decade of life. Advances in medical practice, such as the
development of trauma care centers and treatment of life threatening diseases,
also tend to increase rather than decrease incidence of disability among younger
persons.
Reference: Wodatch J. (1990). The ADA: What it says. Worklife, 3,
3.
Back to top
Opening Doors with the ADA
The scope of the ADA in addressing the barriers to participation by people
with disabilities is very broad. The ADA's civil rights protections are parallel
to those that have previously been established by the federal government for
women and racial, ethnic and religious minorities.
The ADA's definitions of what constitutes discrimination toward people with
disabilities and how barriers to their participation are to be eliminated are
based on more than a decade of experience implementing Section 504.
- Employment
The ADA prohibits discrimination against qualified individuals with
disabilities in public- and private-sector employment. This includes a
requirement that those employers covered under the act make reasonable
accommodations to the known physical or mental limitations of qualified
applicants and employees, unless providing such accommodations would impose
an undue hardship on the employer.
- State and local government
The ADA expands on the requirement of Section 504 that state and local
government programs that receive federal financial assistance provide equal
opportunity to individuals with disabilities to participate and benefit. The
ADA extends the requirement to public programs that are not recipients of
federal financial assistance and, therefore, not covered by Section 504.
- Public accommodations
The ADA's requirements that a wide range of public accommodations in the
private sector eliminate physical, communication and procedural barriers to
access address the widespread exclusion of people with disabilities from the
routine activities of daily life that most Americans take for granted. The
ADA reaches a broad range of sales, rental and service establishments, as
well as educational institutions, recreational facilities and social
services centers.
- Telecommunications
The ADA addresses the need to make telephone communication services
accessible to individuals who have impaired hearing or speech. The ADA
requires that all common carriers provide nationwide telecommunications
relay services. Relay services are operator systems that relay conversations
between people who use Telecommunication Devices for the Deaf or nonvoice
terminal devices and those who use the general voice telephone network.
- Transportation
The ADA seeks to ensure that individuals with disabilities have access to a
full range of public and private transportation. If transportation were to
remain inaccessible to many individuals with disabilities, the ADA's goal of
social integration would be impossible to achieve.
Reference: Wodatch J. (1990). The ADA: What it says. Worklife, 3,
3.
Back to top